Sunday Morning Class · August 2, 2026

How Jesus Interpreted the Old Testament

Study notes on James 1:27 and the larger question it opens up: how did Jesus Himself interpret the Old Testament, and what can we learn from His example?

QR code linking to clarkandkathypickett.org/james

Follow along

Scan the code, or type the address into any browser.

clarkandkathypickett.org/james

These notes will stay online after class, so you can come back to them any time.

Class handout

How Jesus Interpreted the Old Testament

When we study the Gospels, we discover that Jesus was not merely quoting Scripture. He was teaching His disciples how to read the Bible. His interpretation was characterized by four complementary approaches.

1. Historically

Question asked: What did this passage mean in its original historical setting?

Jesus never ignored the original meaning of the Old Testament. For example, when discussing marriage: “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female...” (Matthew 19:4). Jesus goes back to Genesis 1 and 2. He first asks what happened, why God established marriage, and what God’s original design was. Only after establishing the historical meaning does He apply it to His audience.

Likewise, when discussing David eating the consecrated bread (Matthew 12), Jesus expects His listeners to understand the historical event recorded in 1 Samuel 21.

Lesson: Jesus never treated the Old Testament as a collection of disconnected symbols. History mattered. The original author mattered. The original audience mattered.

2. Canonically

Question asked: How does this passage fit within the whole Bible?

Jesus interpreted one passage by using other passages. The Bible explains the Bible. In cleansing the Temple, Jesus combines Isaiah 56:7, “My house shall be called a house of prayer,” with Jeremiah 7:11, “You have made it a den of robbers.” He joins two different books into one interpretation.

Likewise, in Matthew 22 Jesus joins Deuteronomy 6 (love God) and Leviticus 19 (love your neighbor) and says, “On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.” Rather than reading verses in isolation, Jesus reads them as parts of one unified story.

Lesson: No passage should be interpreted without considering the rest of Scripture. Scripture interprets Scripture.

3. Christologically

Question asked: How does this passage point to Christ?

This may be Jesus’ most distinctive way of interpreting the Old Testament. After His resurrection He tells the disciples, “Beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, He interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself” (Luke 24:27). Notice that He did not merely find a few Messianic prophecies. He says all the Scriptures point toward Him. Later He says, “Everything written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled” (Luke 24:44). This includes promises, prophecies, sacrifices, kings, priests, feasts, the Temple, the Exodus, David, Jonah, the bronze serpent, and Passover. All anticipate Christ.

Bronze serpent (Numbers 21) to John 3, “As Moses lifted up the serpent...”
Passover lamb (Exodus 12) to Jesus as “the Lamb of God.”
Manna (Exodus 16) to John 6, “I am the Bread of Life.”

Lesson: Jesus is not an appendix to the Old Testament. He is its center.

4. Redemptive-Historically

Question asked: How does this passage advance God’s unfolding plan to redeem humanity?

This phrase is the least familiar, but it is extremely important. The Bible tells one great story:

Creation → Fall → Abraham → Israel → Exodus → Kingdom → Exile → Promise → Messiah → Church → New Creation

Every event moves the story forward, and Jesus constantly places Himself within this unfolding history. At the Last Supper, Jesus transforms Passover. The Exodus had always pointed toward a greater deliverance. Now Jesus says, “This is My blood of the covenant...” The old redemption becomes the pattern for the greater redemption.

Likewise, when Jesus speaks of Jonah, He is not simply giving a history lesson. Jonah’s three days become a preview of Christ’s resurrection. The Old Testament is moving somewhere, and Jesus says, in effect, “I am where it has been heading.”

The Emmaus Road (Luke 24), the perfect example

If someone asked where we see all four principles together, the answer would be Luke 24. Jesus explains the Scriptures to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus. He does not simply quote isolated verses. Instead He:

Historically explains what Moses and the Prophets originally said.
Canonically connects Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms.
Christologically shows that they speak about Him.
Redemptive-historically explains how His suffering, death, and resurrection complete God’s plan of salvation.

This is perhaps the greatest Bible study ever given.

A helpful illustration

Imagine assembling a thousand-piece jigsaw puzzle.

Historical interpretation examines each individual piece carefully. What does this piece look like?
Canonical interpretation fits each piece together with the others. Where does this piece belong?
Christological interpretation discovers the picture in the center. What is the puzzle ultimately depicting?
Redemptive-historical interpretation sees the entire completed scene and understands the story it tells from beginning to end.

All four perspectives are necessary.

Why this matters for us

Many errors in Bible interpretation result from emphasizing one approach while neglecting the others.

Historical only can reduce the Bible to ancient history without seeing its fulfillment in Christ.
Canonical only may overlook the original context of individual passages.
Christological only can become allegorical if Christ is read into texts without regard for their historical meaning.
Redemptive-historical only may miss the personal and ethical applications Scripture makes to believers.

Jesus models a balanced approach. He honors the historical meaning, interprets each passage within the whole canon, shows how all Scripture points to Himself, and reveals God’s unified plan of redemption unfolding from Genesis to Revelation.

Summary

Principle	Central question	Example
Historical	What did this text mean to its original audience?	Jesus appeals to Genesis 1 and 2 in Matthew 19 to explain God’s original design for marriage.
Canonical	How does this text relate to the rest of Scripture?	Jesus combines Deuteronomy 6 and Leviticus 19 as the foundation of the Law (Matthew 22).
Christological	How does this text point to Christ?	Jesus explains that Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms testify about Him (Luke 24:27, 44).
Redemptive-Historical	How does this text advance God’s plan of redemption?	Jesus shows that Passover, Jonah, and the sacrificial system find their fulfillment in His death and resurrection.

Taken together, these four approaches explain why Jesus could truthfully say, “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about Me” (John 5:39, ESV). The Scriptures retain their historical meaning and literary integrity, yet their deepest unity is found in God’s redemptive work culminating in Christ. This is why the New Testament repeatedly presents Jesus not as replacing the Old Testament, but as bringing it to its intended fulfillment.

Question 1 · Background reading

Does James mean only orphans and widows, or are they representative of a broader class of vulnerable people?

James 1:27 (NLT) says: “Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you.”

The overwhelming consensus among the teachers below is that James is using “orphans and widows” as concrete examples of those who are socially, economically, and legally vulnerable, not as an exhaustive list. The command certainly includes literal orphans and widows, but it extends to all who are powerless, neglected, and in need. Here is how various Bible teachers would likely explain it.

David Pawson

Pawson emphasizes that genuine faith is always demonstrated by practical obedience. He points out that in the Old Testament, orphans and widows were the classic examples of people who had no natural protector. James is not limiting Christian compassion to those two groups but is using them as representatives of everyone society tends to overlook. True religion is seen in sacrificial care for the vulnerable rather than merely attending religious meetings.

Jack Hayford

Hayford often taught that the kingdom of God expresses itself through compassion. He would see “orphans and widows” as symbols of those lacking provision, protection, and advocacy. Spirit-filled believers demonstrate God’s fatherly heart by serving anyone who is weak, lonely, or oppressed.

Tim Keller

Keller frequently observed that throughout Scripture, “the widow, the orphan, the immigrant, and the poor” form a recurring group representing the vulnerable. He would argue that James echoes this Old Testament concern and calls believers to seek justice and mercy for all marginalized people, not only two literal categories.

Augustine

Augustine understood works of mercy as expressions of genuine love flowing from transformed hearts. He would not restrict the verse to two groups but would see widows and orphans as examples of anyone needing Christian charity. Love of neighbor naturally extends wherever human need exists.

Martin Luther

Luther insisted that good works never earn salvation but always follow true faith. Caring for widows and orphans demonstrates living faith. While James names two specific groups, Luther would understand them as representative of those whom believers are called to serve through love.

Aimee Semple McPherson

McPherson’s ministry included extensive charitable outreach during the Great Depression. She would almost certainly apply James to caring for anyone suffering poverty, sickness, abandonment, or hardship, seeing practical compassion as evidence of Christ’s love.

D. Elton Trueblood

As a Quaker theologian, Trueblood stressed that authentic Christianity expresses itself through practical service. He would see “orphans and widows” as representative of those without power or influence whom Christians are called to serve.

Skip Heitzig

Heitzig often notes the Old Testament background. Israel repeatedly received commands to protect widows, orphans, foreigners, and the poor. James therefore uses familiar biblical language to describe compassionate ministry toward all vulnerable people.

John Piper

Piper teaches that delight in God overflows into love for people. He would say that orphans and widows remain specific objects of God’s concern, but the principle extends to everyone who is helpless, poor, or afflicted. Christian compassion reflects God’s own heart for the defenseless.

Jonathan Edwards

Edwards argued that genuine religious affections produce practical love. He would understand James to be describing a pattern of self-sacrificing love toward those unable to repay us, using widows and orphans as prime examples.

Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Lloyd-Jones emphasized that regeneration changes the whole person. James is describing the outward evidence of inward transformation. Widows and orphans represent those who most clearly reveal whether our faith is active and compassionate.

David Guzik

Guzik explicitly comments that widows and orphans were the weakest members of ancient society. He applies the passage broadly to all who are disadvantaged and in distress, while noting that literal widows and orphans remain worthy of special care because Scripture consistently highlights them.

Charles Spurgeon

Spurgeon frequently preached that Christians should imitate God’s compassion for the helpless. He would likely say that while James specifically names widows and orphans, the principle reaches every person in need, since Christ Himself identified with “the least of these.”

Old Testament background

James is drawing on a long biblical tradition:

Exodus 22:22, “You shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child.”
Deuteronomy 10:18, God “executes justice for the fatherless and the widow.”
Deuteronomy 24:17-21, care for widows, orphans, and foreigners.
Psalm 68:5, “Father of the fatherless and protector of widows.”
Isaiah 1:17, “Defend the orphan. Plead for the widow.”

Notice that these passages often group widows and orphans with foreigners, the poor, and the oppressed, showing that they function as representative examples of society’s most vulnerable people.

Summary

Nearly all of these interpreters would agree on four points:

James certainly includes literal orphans and widows.
They are representative of all who lack protection, resources, or advocates.
The command reflects God’s consistent concern throughout the Old Testament for the vulnerable.
Practical mercy is evidence of genuine faith, not a substitute for it.

This fits James’s larger emphasis throughout the letter. True faith is not merely professed. It is demonstrated in tangible acts of love toward those who cannot easily repay us.

Question 2 · Background reading

In everyday language, do we use phrases that communicate much more than their literal words?

Below are popular phrases which are generally regarded as having a commonly understood, broad, significant meaning, such as “saying our I do’s” or “We the people.” Linguists sometimes call these formulaic expressions, stock phrases, metonyms, or loaded phrases. They are brief expressions that evoke an entire event, story, document, or shared cultural understanding.

Foundational historical and political phrases

“We the People...” (the U.S. Constitution) · “Four score and seven years ago...” · “Give me liberty, or give me death.” · “I have a dream...” · “Ask not what your country can do for you...” · “The shot heard ’round the world.” · “Crossing the Rubicon.” · “Remember the Alamo.” · “Boston Tea Party.” · “Pearl Harbor.” · “D-Day.” · “9/11.”

Marriage and family

“Saying our ‘I do’s.’” · “Walking down the aisle.” · “Tying the knot.” · “Exchanging vows.” · “Happily ever after.” · “Until death do us part.” · “The honeymoon.”

American civic life

“Pledge of Allegiance.” · “The Star-Spangled Banner.” · “The Bill of Rights.” · “The American Dream.” · “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

Christian and biblical phrases

“The Lord’s Prayer.” · “The Good Samaritan.” · “The Prodigal Son.” · “The Sermon on the Mount.” · “The Great Commission.” · “The Great Commandment.” · “The Golden Rule.” · “The Last Supper.” · “The Passion.” · “The Crucifixion.” · “The Resurrection.” · “The Road to Damascus.” · “The Exodus.” · “The Fall.” · “The Flood.” · “The Promised Land.” · “The Good Shepherd.” · “The Bread of Life.” · “The Great Physician.”

Common literary or proverbial expressions

“Pandora’s box.” · “Achilles’ heel.” · “David and Goliath.” · “The writing on the wall.” · “The elephant in the room.” · “The straw that broke the camel’s back.” · “The calm before the storm.” · “A wolf in sheep’s clothing.” · “The tip of the iceberg.” · “Opening a can of worms.”

Military and ceremonial

“Laying down one’s life.” · “The ultimate sacrifice.” · “Passing the torch.” · “Changing of the guard.” · “The final salute.”

Business and legal

“Signing on the dotted line.” · “A handshake agreement.” · “The bottom line.” · “Beyond a reasonable doubt.” · “The burden of proof.” · “Due process.”

Life events

“Turning the page.” · “Coming of age.” · “Crossing the finish line.” · “The empty nest.” · “The golden years.”

Why these phrases are powerful

Each phrase functions as a verbal shorthand. A few words call to mind a much larger body of knowledge, memories, or commitments. For example:

“We the People” evokes the entire U.S. Constitution.
“I do” evokes an entire wedding ceremony and lifelong covenant.
“The Good Samaritan” recalls Jesus’ entire parable and its lesson on neighborly love.
“The Exodus” brings to mind Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and God’s covenant faithfulness.
“The Passion” refers to the whole narrative of Jesus’ suffering, crucifixion, and the events leading up to it.

This observation is especially helpful in biblical interpretation. Jesus and the New Testament writers often quoted only the opening words or a brief portion of an Old Testament passage, expecting their hearers, who knew the Scriptures well, to recall the larger context. For example, when Jesus cried, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Psalm 22:1), many scholars believe He intentionally invoked the entire psalm, which begins with suffering but ends in confidence that God will vindicate His righteous servant. This is much like saying “We the People” or “I have a dream” today. A few words evoke an entire, well-known text.

Question 3 · Background reading

Where did Jesus interpret the Old Testament? A passage list

Jesus repeatedly interpreted the Old Testament, explaining its true meaning, showing how it pointed to Himself, correcting misunderstandings, and applying it authoritatively. Below is a representative list, organized by purpose.

1. Jesus explained that the Old Testament pointed to Him

Luke 4:16-21 (Isaiah 61:1-2): “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
John 5:39-47: Jesus explains that Moses wrote about Him.
Luke 24:25-27: Beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, Jesus explained everything concerning Himself.
Luke 24:44-47: “Everything written about Me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.”

2. Jesus interpreted specific Messianic prophecies

Matthew 21:42 (Psalm 118:22-23), the rejected stone.
Matthew 22:41-46 (Psalm 110:1), David’s Lord.
Mark 12:35-37 and Luke 20:41-44, parallel passages.
John 6:31-35 (Exodus 16, manna): Jesus identifies Himself as the true Bread from heaven.

3. Jesus interpreted Jonah

Matthew 12:38-41: Jonah becomes a sign of Christ’s death and resurrection.
Luke 11:29-32, parallel account.

4. Jesus interpreted the bronze serpent

John 3:14-15 (Numbers 21:4-9): the bronze serpent foreshadows Christ on the cross.

5. Jesus interpreted the Passover

Matthew 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-25, Luke 22:14-20.
John 1:29: John the Baptist identifies Him as the Lamb of God, and Jesus fulfills this imagery. John 19 fulfills Passover imagery.

6. Jesus interpreted the Temple

John 2:18-22: Jesus identifies His body as the true Temple.

7. Jesus interpreted the Sabbath

Matthew 12:1-14: David eating the consecrated bread (1 Samuel 21), priests working on the Sabbath (Numbers 28), Hosea 6:6. Jesus declares Himself Lord of the Sabbath.
Mark 2:23-28, Luke 6:1-11.

8. Jesus interpreted marriage

Matthew 19:3-9 (Genesis 1:27, Genesis 2:24, Deuteronomy 24): Jesus explains God’s original intention.
Mark 10:2-12.

9. Jesus interpreted resurrection

Matthew 22:23-33 (Exodus 3:6): “I am the God of Abraham...”
Mark 12:18-27, Luke 20:27-40.

10. Jesus interpreted the greatest commandments

Matthew 22:34-40 (Deuteronomy 6:5, Leviticus 19:18): all the Law and Prophets hang on these.
Mark 12:28-34.

11. Jesus interpreted Psalm 82

John 10:34-36 (Psalm 82:6), “You are gods.”

12. Jesus interpreted Isaiah concerning unbelief

John 12:37-41 (Isaiah 53, Isaiah 6): Jesus explains Israel’s rejection.

13. Jesus interpreted Elijah

Matthew 11:7-15 (Malachi 3:1, Malachi 4:5-6): John the Baptist came in Elijah’s role.
Matthew 17:10-13, Mark 9:11-13.

14. Jesus interpreted Daniel

Matthew 24:15 (Daniel 9:27, Daniel 11, Daniel 12): the “abomination of desolation.”
Mark 13:14.

15. Jesus interpreted Zechariah

Matthew 21:1-11 (Zechariah 9:9), the Triumphal Entry.
Matthew 26:31 (Zechariah 13:7), “Strike the shepherd...”

16. Jesus interpreted Isaiah’s servant prophecy

Luke 22:37 (Isaiah 53:12), “numbered with the transgressors.”

17. Jesus interpreted the Law in the Sermon on the Mount

In Matthew 5 through 7 Jesus repeatedly says, “You have heard that it was said... but I say to you...” Examples include murder (Exodus 20), adultery (Exodus 20), divorce (Deuteronomy 24), oaths (Leviticus 19, Numbers 30), retaliation (Exodus 21), and love your neighbor (Leviticus 19). Here Jesus authoritatively reveals the Law’s deeper intent.

18. Jesus interpreted the Shema and love of neighbor

Luke 10:25-37 (Deuteronomy 6:5, Leviticus 19:18): through the Parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus explains what it truly means to love one’s neighbor.

19. Jesus interpreted Hosea

Matthew 9:13 (Hosea 6:6), “I desire mercy and not sacrifice.” Matthew 12:7 applies the same passage again.

20. Jesus interpreted Isaiah 56 and Jeremiah 7

Matthew 21:12-13, Mark 11:15-17, Luke 19:45-46: Jesus combines Isaiah 56:7, “My house shall be called a house of prayer,” with Jeremiah 7:11, “a den of robbers,” to explain the corruption of Temple worship.

Major categories of Jesus’ Old Testament interpretation

Category	Examples
Fulfilled in Himself	Luke 4, Luke 24, John 5
Messianic prophecies	Psalms 110 and 118, Isaiah 53, Zechariah 9 and 13
Typology	Jonah, Passover, manna, bronze serpent, Temple
Law interpretation	Sermon on the Mount, Sabbath, marriage, greatest commandments
Prophetic interpretation	Daniel, Elijah, Isaiah, Hosea, Jeremiah
Doctrinal interpretation	Resurrection, kingdom, Messiah, neighbor-love

Particularly significant for understanding Jesus’ hermeneutics

If you wanted to understand how Jesus interpreted the Old Testament, these passages are foundational:

Matthew 5 through 7, the Sermon on the Mount
Matthew 22, the great commandments and Psalm 110
Luke 4:16-30, Isaiah 61
Luke 10:25-37, the Good Samaritan
Luke 24:13-35, the road to Emmaus
Luke 24:44-49, Law, Prophets, and Psalms fulfilled
John 5:39-47, Moses wrote about Christ
John 3:14-15, the bronze serpent
John 6, the manna
Matthew 24, Daniel and the Olivet Discourse

Together, these passages reveal that Jesus interpreted the Old Testament historically, canonically, Christologically, and redemptive-historically, showing that all of Scripture ultimately finds its fulfillment in Him.

Other lessons in this class

Back to the class page